From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 10:53:27 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 09:53:27 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" for me to do it. The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do worse. Not that bad, I admit. On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: > they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly > now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask > them to do it again with telepathy. > THEIR telepathy > > I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people > aboard. > > > On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >> >> >> 'secret space war" >> >> 'secret space war" >> >> "secret space war" >> >> PUKE >> >> Like humans ever had a say about anything >> >> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>> a "parting gift" :) >>> >>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>> >>> >>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>> myself :) >>> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>> >>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>> >>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>> her her her her >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 11:02:57 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:02:57 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: what if? what if those passengers really wer taken to "heaven" by the "good" guys, as part of a war going on, wih humans being trapped on the "satanic" side.... On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: > Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" > for me to do it. > The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and > while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do > worse. > Not that bad, I admit. > > > > On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >> they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly >> now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask >> them to do it again with telepathy. >> THEIR telepathy >> >> I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people >> aboard. >> >> >> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >>> >>> >>> 'secret space war" >>> >>> 'secret space war" >>> >>> "secret space war" >>> >>> PUKE >>> >>> Like humans ever had a say about anything >>> >>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>> a "parting gift" :) >>>> >>>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>>> >>>> >>>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>>> myself :) >>>> >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>>> >>>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>>> >>>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>>> her her her her >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 11:42:50 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:42:50 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/04/01 On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: > what if? > > what if those passengers really wer taken to "heaven" by the "good" > guys, as part of a war going on, wih humans being trapped on the > "satanic" side.... > > > > On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >> Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" >> for me to do it. >> The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and >> while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do >> worse. >> Not that bad, I admit. >> >> >> >> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>> they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly >>> now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask >>> them to do it again with telepathy. >>> THEIR telepathy >>> >>> I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people >>> aboard. >>> >>> >>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >>>> >>>> >>>> 'secret space war" >>>> >>>> 'secret space war" >>>> >>>> "secret space war" >>>> >>>> PUKE >>>> >>>> Like humans ever had a say about anything >>>> >>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>> a "parting gift" :) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>>>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>>>> myself :) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>>>> >>>>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>>>> >>>>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>>>> her her her her >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 12:08:22 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:08:22 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: WW2 hasn't been finished. don't think Itunes or sunday church is going to get it On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: > http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/04/01 > > > > On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >> what if? >> >> what if those passengers really wer taken to "heaven" by the "good" >> guys, as part of a war going on, wih humans being trapped on the >> "satanic" side.... >> >> >> >> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>> Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" >>> for me to do it. >>> The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and >>> while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do >>> worse. >>> Not that bad, I admit. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>> they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly >>>> now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask >>>> them to do it again with telepathy. >>>> THEIR telepathy >>>> >>>> I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people >>>> aboard. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>> >>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>> >>>>> "secret space war" >>>>> >>>>> PUKE >>>>> >>>>> Like humans ever had a say about anything >>>>> >>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>> a "parting gift" :) >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>>>>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>>>>> myself :) >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>>>>> >>>>>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>>>>> >>>>>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>>>>> her her her her >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 12:17:10 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:17:10 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'm not going to fight the devil for a race that disrepects nature and is afraid to even speak of what is happening :) On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: > WW2 hasn't been finished. > > don't think Itunes or sunday church is going to get it > > On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/04/01 >> >> >> >> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>> what if? >>> >>> what if those passengers really wer taken to "heaven" by the "good" >>> guys, as part of a war going on, wih humans being trapped on the >>> "satanic" side.... >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>>> Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" >>>> for me to do it. >>>> The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and >>>> while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do >>>> worse. >>>> Not that bad, I admit. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>> they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly >>>>> now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask >>>>> them to do it again with telepathy. >>>>> THEIR telepathy >>>>> >>>>> I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people >>>>> aboard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>>> >>>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>>> >>>>>> "secret space war" >>>>>> >>>>>> PUKE >>>>>> >>>>>> Like humans ever had a say about anything >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>>> a "parting gift" :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>>>>>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>>>>>> myself :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>>>>>> her her her her >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 1 14:02:37 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:02:37 -0500 Subject: OFF) comedy courtesy Mary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: There's just something postively delightful about the fact that nobody can 100 percent afford to laugh, point the finger and say "April fool" :) But I am...... On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: > I'm not going to fight the devil for a race that disrepects nature and > is afraid to even speak of what is happening :) > > On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >> WW2 hasn't been finished. >> >> don't think Itunes or sunday church is going to get it >> >> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/04/01 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>>> what if? >>>> >>>> what if those passengers really wer taken to "heaven" by the "good" >>>> guys, as part of a war going on, wih humans being trapped on the >>>> "satanic" side.... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/1/14, mike c wrote: >>>>> Just some early morning credit where due: sorry the forum "suffers" >>>>> for me to do it. >>>>> The media appears not to be creating fake plane wreckage so far, and >>>>> while the floating objects were getting on my nerves they could do >>>>> worse. >>>>> Not that bad, I admit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>> they betrter hurry and wrap up the Malaysian airliner lies awiftly >>>>>> now, or I will play :"light in the sky" on the holodeck again and ask >>>>>> them to do it again with telepathy. >>>>>> THEIR telepathy >>>>>> >>>>>> I will of course, ask nicely and humbly for somethihng without people >>>>>> aboard. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>>> the mind kontrol techniques make such fools out of humans >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'secret space war" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "secret space war" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PUKE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Like humans ever had a say about anything >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/31/14, mike c wrote: >>>>>>>> a "parting gift" :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/03/31 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i've been wondering for a few days niow how annoying "tasting like >>>>>>>> Chicken" is to Mary, likerly for an entirely different reason than >>>>>>>> myself :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/secret-space-war/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it's clear that I'm the new alien on the block and: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'I DO NOT CHOOSE NOW TO DO WHAT I CAME TO DO" :) :) >>>>>>>> her her her her >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 20:53:57 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (Cousin It) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 19:53:57 -0500 Subject: (STRAYED) HW Chicago Lounge Ax 1989 In-Reply-To: <5330267c.74698c0a.7469.186dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 3/24/14, mary sullivan wrote: > Mike, they may be trying to sound more cultured and make you think you are > more intelligent for listening to them with the accents? Silly me- HOW could i have been so slow.......to realise..... the push for diversity isn't about "people" at all.... :) From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 22:04:22 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:04:22 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested Message-ID: I just remembered that i caught a snip of this on the news last night. https://www.google.com/search?q=lsd+overdoses+in+mckinney at first I thought "hype", and then I thought "oh dear it sounds like what happened to Jeff Mirage in years past". I haven't read anything yet phew, glad I am old and got me Hawkwind records for that From smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 22:26:37 2014 From: smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM (Jonathan Smith) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:26:37 +0800 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a potent phenylethylamine. Not really related. On 8 April 2014 10:04, mike c wrote: > I just remembered that i caught a snip of this on the news last night. > https://www.google.com/search?q=lsd+overdoses+in+mckinney > > at first I thought "hype", and then I thought "oh dear it sounds like > what happened to Jeff Mirage in years past". > > I haven't read anything yet > > phew, glad I am old and got me Hawkwind records for that > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 23:15:59 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:15:59 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a potent > phenylethylamine. Not really related. Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things are differnet than I thought. First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong dose of LSD. Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, but have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) anyway, the comments here I thought were good link http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigating-juvenile-overdoses.html/ but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form of ecstacy or something? one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to link the drug. can't trust anything anyone says here anymore God what a mess From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 23:27:58 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:27:58 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a truck and killed himself On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a >> potent >> phenylethylamine. Not really related. > > Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. > I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it > 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. > However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things > are differnet than I thought. > First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. > I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. > The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the > highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong > dose of LSD. > Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a > blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, > but > have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) > anyway, the comments here I thought were good > link > http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigating-juvenile-overdoses.html/ > > but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form > of ecstacy or something? > > one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to > link the drug. > > can't trust anything anyone says here anymore > God what a mess > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Mon Apr 7 23:42:15 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:42:15 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: the media needs to be fined if there is blaming of something untrue :) On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless > the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. > > the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a > truck and killed himself > > > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: >> On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >>> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a >>> potent >>> phenylethylamine. Not really related. >> >> Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. >> I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it >> 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. >> However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things >> are differnet than I thought. >> First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. >> I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. >> The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the >> highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong >> dose of LSD. >> Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a >> blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, >> but >> have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) >> anyway, the comments here I thought were good >> link >> http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigating-juvenile-overdoses.html/ >> >> but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form >> of ecstacy or something? >> >> one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to >> link the drug. >> >> can't trust anything anyone says here anymore >> God what a mess >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 00:00:14 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:00:14 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I realise my spelling errors and kamikaze people I've met do not exactly look very smart. I am embarrassed of myself last time (again), and i hope this wasn't too tacky :) I honestly do not mean to be a wart :) Not too often anyway :) I thought the topic was unusual in this day, if it was as reported. On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > the media needs to be fined if there is blaming of something untrue :) > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: >> and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless >> the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. >> >> the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a >> truck and killed himself >> >> >> >> On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: >>> On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >>>> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a >>>> potent >>>> phenylethylamine. Not really related. >>> >>> Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. >>> I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it >>> 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. >>> However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things >>> are differnet than I thought. >>> First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. >>> I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. >>> The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the >>> highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong >>> dose of LSD. >>> Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a >>> blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, >>> but >>> have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) >>> anyway, the comments here I thought were good >>> link >>> http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigating-juvenile-overdoses.html/ >>> >>> but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form >>> of ecstacy or something? >>> >>> one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to >>> link the drug. >>> >>> can't trust anything anyone says here anymore >>> God what a mess >>> >> > From smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 01:16:03 2014 From: smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM (Jonathan Smith) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:16:03 +0800 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I think that LSD overdoses in men/women are non-existent. They did manage to kill an elephant once by making it eat grammes of the stuff. http://scienceblogs.com/retrospectacle/2007/05/30/science-vault-how-much-lsd-doe-1/ There are lots of psychedelic around these abd some are quite toxic sadly but people still take too much. There are a few psychedelics which can fit onto a blotter but they are a bit dangerous, On 8 April 2014 11:42, mike c wrote: > the media needs to be fined if there is blaming of something untrue :) > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > > and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless > > the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. > > > > the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a > > truck and killed himself > > > > > > > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > >> On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > >>> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a > >>> potent > >>> phenylethylamine. Not really related. > >> > >> Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. > >> I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it > >> 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. > >> However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things > >> are differnet than I thought. > >> First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. > >> I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. > >> The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the > >> highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong > >> dose of LSD. > >> Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a > >> blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, > >> but > >> have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) > >> anyway, the comments here I thought were good > >> link > >> > http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigating-juvenile-overdoses.html/ > >> > >> but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form > >> of ecstacy or something? > >> > >> one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to > >> link the drug. > >> > >> can't trust anything anyone says here anymore > >> God what a mess > >> > > > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 08:52:50 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:52:50 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Talk about disinformation, "a synthetic dose of lsd," it's synthetic already, when I read it's a synthetic of mescalin, I got it, doesn't sound like a good way to go. I was aware of the elephant, what will they cook up next? Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of Jonathan Smith Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 1:16 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested I think that LSD overdoses in men/women are non-existent. They did manage to kill an elephant once by making it eat grammes of the stuff. http://scienceblogs.com/retrospectacle/2007/05/30/science-vault-how-much-lsd -doe-1/ There are lots of psychedelic around these abd some are quite toxic sadly but people still take too much. There are a few psychedelics which can fit onto a blotter but they are a bit dangerous, On 8 April 2014 11:42, mike c wrote: > the media needs to be fined if there is blaming of something untrue :) > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > > and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, > > unless the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. > > > > the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a > > truck and killed himself > > > > > > > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > >> On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > >>> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a > >>> a potent phenylethylamine. Not really related. > >> > >> Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. > >> I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it > >> 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. > >> However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and > >> things are differnet than I thought. > >> First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. > >> I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. > >> The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the > >> highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a > >> strong dose of LSD. > >> Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on > >> a blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my > >> time, but have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the > >> USA? :) anyway, the comments here I thought were good link > >> > http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigati > ng-juvenile-overdoses.html/ > >> > >> but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another > >> form of ecstacy or something? > >> > >> one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying > >> to link the drug. > >> > >> can't trust anything anyone says here anymore God what a mess > >> > > > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 08:56:08 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:56:08 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: It is weird, no need for apologies. -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 12:00 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested I realise my spelling errors and kamikaze people I've met do not exactly look very smart. I am embarrassed of myself last time (again), and i hope this wasn't too tacky :) I honestly do not mean to be a wart :) Not too often anyway :) I thought the topic was unusual in this day, if it was as reported. On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > the media needs to be fined if there is blaming of something untrue :) > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: >> and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless >> the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. >> >> the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a >> truck and killed himself >> >> >> >> On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: >>> On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >>>> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a >>>> potent phenylethylamine. Not really related. >>> >>> Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. >>> I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it >>> 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. >>> However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things >>> are differnet than I thought. >>> First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. >>> I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. >>> The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the >>> highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a >>> strong dose of LSD. >>> Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a >>> blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my >>> time, but have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the >>> USA? :) anyway, the comments here I thought were good link >>> http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investiga >>> ting-juvenile-overdoses.html/ >>> >>> but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another >>> form of ecstacy or something? >>> >>> one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to >>> link the drug. >>> >>> can't trust anything anyone says here anymore God what a mess >>> >> > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 08:57:06 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:57:06 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: You say I come up with disturbing shit, that is a shame, really. Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:28 PM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless the death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a truck and killed himself On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a >> potent phenylethylamine. Not really related. > > Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. > I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it > 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. > However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things > are differnet than I thought. > First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. > I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. > The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the > highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong > dose of LSD. > Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a > blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, > but have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) > anyway, the comments here I thought were good link > http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigati > ng-juvenile-overdoses.html/ > > but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form > of ecstacy or something? > > one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to > link the drug. > > can't trust anything anyone says here anymore God what a mess > From smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 09:04:29 2014 From: smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM (Jonathan Smith) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:04:29 +0800 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: <5343f281.c518e00a.0222.05b4SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Not disturbing... Yes, that kind of compound is more closely related to mescaline. On 8 Apr 2014 20:58, "mary sullivan" wrote: > You say I come up with disturbing shit, that is a shame, really. > > Mary > > -----Original Message----- > From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] > On > Behalf Of mike c > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:28 PM > To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET > Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested > > and of cousre finding a TRUE LSD-fatality woild be hard to do, unless the > death was from doing something nuts while under the influence. > > the guy with my friends said "watch this", then jumped in front of a truck > and killed himself > > > > On 4/7/14, mike c wrote: > > On 4/7/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > >> This stuff is not 'synthetic LSD' (LSD is synthetic) anyway but a a > >> potent phenylethylamine. Not really related. > > > > Dear Jonathan, thnaks for posting. > > I admit, I have always been interested in this drug, consider it > > 'apart" from others, and not unintelligent. > > However, i did not realise the news is witholding details and things > > are differnet than I thought. > > First, I thought :"overdose" means "fatality", where LSD is concerned. > > I am very glad for the kids that THESE 3 did not die. > > The news last night mentioned one of them walking naked along the > > highway or a road at least, and that sounds like it could be a strong > > dose of LSD. > > Also, I thought other chemicals which could do the same and fit on a > > blotter were rare to nonexistent these days, er, since before my time, > > but have the "aliens" exhausted all our ergot supplies in the USA? :) > > anyway, the comments here I thought were good link > > http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/mckinney-police-investigati > > ng-juvenile-overdoses.html/ > > > > but it sounds like you know more already?? are you saying another form > > of ecstacy or something? > > > > one kid did die earlier (meantioned in link) and they are trying to > > link the drug. > > > > can't trust anything anyone says here anymore God what a mess > > > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 09:55:20 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:55:20 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 4/8/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Not disturbing... Yes, that kind of compound is more closely related to > mescaline. if the chocolate stuff I did was indeed mescaline, there was no way I was getting naked.... there was no way I was stepping outside the apartment... when my friend did, I stayed at the door in fear, for him, and me.... he was back really fast :) and wow, that comedown.....back to normal so fast... From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 11:09:09 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:09:09 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: being overpowered into nakedness was a worst fear :). I could see where that could happen. if only there was a safe, non frightening, legal method for old farts :).... I wonder if clothing was a devious plot by ancient aliens to cause us to have endless wars... oh yeah, some peoplle NEED covering...... On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/8/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: >> Not disturbing... Yes, that kind of compound is more closely related to >> mescaline. > > if the chocolate stuff I did was indeed mescaline, there was no way I > was getting naked.... > > there was no way I was stepping outside the apartment... > > when my friend did, I stayed at the door in fear, for him, and me.... > > he was back really fast :) > > and wow, that comedown.....back to normal so fast... > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 11:32:33 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:32:33 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I've never had a mescaline experience. -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:55 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested On 4/8/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Not disturbing... Yes, that kind of compound is more closely related > to mescaline. if the chocolate stuff I did was indeed mescaline, there was no way I was getting naked.... there was no way I was stepping outside the apartment... when my friend did, I stayed at the door in fear, for him, and me.... he was back really fast :) and wow, that comedown.....back to normal so fast... From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 11:35:14 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:35:14 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was quite the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never know, on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to her synthetic well known cousin? Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:55 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested On 4/8/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Not disturbing... Yes, that kind of compound is more closely related > to mescaline. if the chocolate stuff I did was indeed mescaline, there was no way I was getting naked.... there was no way I was stepping outside the apartment... when my friend did, I stayed at the door in fear, for him, and me.... he was back really fast :) and wow, that comedown.....back to normal so fast... From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 11:55:50 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:55:50 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: <53441785.2d508c0a.1866.7b5cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: > John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was quite > the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never know, > on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to her > synthetic well known cousin? > > Mary are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, etc) From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 14:34:09 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:34:09 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: how sad kids wanting to have an LSD experience are dead because humans are unable to free themselves from the dark forces making fools of them, On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >> John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was >> quite >> the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never >> know, >> on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to >> her >> synthetic well known cousin? >> >> Mary > > are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? > (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, etc) > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 14:44:11 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:44:11 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: there's only 1 place and 1 place only where humanity (the public) might seek it's answer. On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > how sad > > kids wanting to have an LSD experience are dead because humans are > unable to free themselves from the dark forces making fools of them, > > > > On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >> On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >>> John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was >>> quite >>> the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never >>> know, >>> on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to >>> her >>> synthetic well known cousin? >>> >>> Mary >> >> are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? >> (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, etc) >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 14:49:51 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:49:51 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I wonder if the plane was taken as part of an effort to force disclosure. or to see if humans would start a war over it On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > there's only 1 place and 1 place only where humanity (the public) > might seek it's answer. > > > On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >> how sad >> >> kids wanting to have an LSD experience are dead because humans are >> unable to free themselves from the dark forces making fools of them, >> >> >> >> On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >>> On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >>>> John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was >>>> quite >>>> the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never >>>> know, >>>> on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to >>>> her >>>> synthetic well known cousin? >>>> >>>> Mary >>> >>> are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? >>> (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, >>> etc) >>> >> > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Tue Apr 8 23:09:01 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 23:09:01 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: enjoy -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:56 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: > John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was > quite the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll > never know, on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever > that is) to her synthetic well known cousin? > > Mary are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, etc) From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 23:11:11 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:11:11 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'm embarrassed for the zillioneth time final comments 1) LSD is no doubt dangerous. BUT, from my point of view the dosages were lowered from what they were in the 60s and into 70s to make it safer. From my experience as long as you don't take too much you might get scared but will be okay. (usually) Not die from some crap chemlcal because the PTB sterilize our world and make things worse. Maybe I am wrong in this case, but can imagine ergot supplies become more tightly controlled as anything else that might lead to creativity or dare I say "fun". In no way do I argue that LSD is not a risk, or that I would want my kids taking any:) it is basically a "nightmare drug" at it's root, only made leisure by lowinf dosage enough. NOT NOT NOT for everyone, but NOT deadly unto itself. 2) obviously I hate living in a world where people get up in the morning thinking about breakfast and their own survial rather than the UFO issue :) Once again, I know this is a music forum and sorry I went all over with what was just intended to catch Mary's eye and maybe one or 2 more. On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > I wonder if the plane was taken as part of an effort to > > force disclosure. > > or to see if humans would start a war over it > > On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >> there's only 1 place and 1 place only where humanity (the public) >> might seek it's answer. >> >> >> On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >>> how sad >>> >>> kids wanting to have an LSD experience are dead because humans are >>> unable to free themselves from the dark forces making fools of them, >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >>>> On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >>>>> John, sounds like from what I've been told the "chocolate stuff," was >>>>> quite >>>>> the rage, so you probably did get the real deal. I guess I'll never >>>>> know, >>>>> on that one. I've been told it's more colorful, (whatever that is) to >>>>> her >>>>> synthetic well known cousin? >>>>> >>>>> Mary >>>> >>>> are we SURE Mckinney isn't a tourist attraction now?? >>>> (sorry, I get excited when it's UFO nite, despite the holy clothing, >>>> etc) >>>> >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Tue Apr 8 23:34:38 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:34:38 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: <5344ba3c.4115e00a.5e1f.0ea7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: > enjoy oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if he's my cup of tea:) (his own personal) Link http://www.paralleltime.com/ "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Wed Apr 9 13:59:53 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:59:53 -0500 Subject: OFF) Mars Message-ID: Well go on then, check out the light on Mars It can be anything you want, it's for you :) From steve.bishop at DB.COM Thu Apr 10 03:01:16 2014 From: steve.bishop at DB.COM (Steve Bishop) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:01:16 +0100 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? Message-ID: Sadly the Company I work for has gone all 'big brother' on emails and i need to stop incoming non-work mails .... frustrating. Thanks Steve --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional corporate and regulatory EU disclosures and to http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about privacy. From smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM Wed Apr 9 01:35:24 2014 From: smithjm77x7 at GMAIL.COM (Jonathan Smith) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:35:24 +0800 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Two people-- Alexander Shulgin and Dr David Nichols developed a lot of psychedelics. Others have carried on their work. The problem is that they are then sold by online vendors and taken by kids who do not do their research about doses. There have been a number of compounds with small enough doses to fit on a blotter, but kids will then take more too quickly and the results can be bad. LSD is not toxic but others have a much lower LD50 |(the dose at which 50% dies). On 9 April 2014 11:34, mike c wrote: > On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: > > enjoy > > oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) > it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone > is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess > to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if > he's my cup of tea:) > > (his own personal) Link > > http://www.paralleltime.com/ > > "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Thu Apr 10 18:27:41 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (diff-A-cult) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:27:41 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Unless of course our "parents" lost a war and we became a kind of 'booty". What fascinates me, at this moment, is.... who might THEY be hiding from...... considering that it's apparently competitive out there, and advanced civilisations seem to do that. WILL WE be fighting on their front lines some day :) :) I wonder if being "hairy" means you have more natural "rights" in a way :) On 4/10/14, diff-A-cult wrote: > I have a theory, based upon my ongoing work, that our parents are > using the implant in the back of Mary's neck to "turn her off" by 10 > :) > > they seem concerend with us NOT getting too established in the psychic > department. > > after all, it's THEIR world...:) > > On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >> On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >>> enjoy >> >> oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) >> it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone >> is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess >> to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if >> he's my cup of tea:) >> >> (his own personal) Link >> >> http://www.paralleltime.com/ >> >> "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Thu Apr 10 20:53:55 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (diff-A-cult) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:53:55 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: my point to all this this besides teasing mary? it seems clear enough to me that if we become peaceful and can thow off the negative influences of ourselves, we might just get another crack at open contact with the most intelligent beings living inside the earth. we might have to be "willing slaves", whatever.... besides some of the humans who also are.... On 4/10/14, diff-A-cult wrote: > Unless of course our "parents" lost a war and we became a kind of 'booty". > > What fascinates me, at this moment, is.... > > who might THEY be hiding from...... > > considering that it's apparently competitive out there, and advanced > civilisations seem to do that. > > WILL WE be fighting on their front lines some day :) :) > > I wonder if being "hairy" means you have more natural "rights" in a way :) > > > On 4/10/14, diff-A-cult wrote: >> I have a theory, based upon my ongoing work, that our parents are >> using the implant in the back of Mary's neck to "turn her off" by 10 >> :) >> >> they seem concerend with us NOT getting too established in the psychic >> department. >> >> after all, it's THEIR world...:) >> >> On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: >>> On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >>>> enjoy >>> >>> oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) >>> it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone >>> is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess >>> to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if >>> he's my cup of tea:) >>> >>> (his own personal) Link >>> >>> http://www.paralleltime.com/ >>> >>> "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 12:27:57 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:27:57 -0500 Subject: OFF) Mars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: It's time the people were RESPECTED, is my point sorry all this, I simply see the humans livng here as 'herds of cattle" themselves On 4/11/14, mike c wrote: > I heard some pretty wild stuff said about Mars last night. > One person was saying it appears to be only a satellite itself, and > that the actual planet itself is GONE!! > > which is a real problem for human minds..... > > also, that radiation seems to indicate nuclear shenanigans, etc... > > But a 'new" concept has slipped into my field of vision- > > that some of recovered UFO technology, assuming it exists, was neither > shot down by us, nor a crash, but maybe shot down FOR US..... > WEEEEEEEE? > > I really think the (Amercan) public has got to stop the bozo shit > going on so we can get in (safely) on some of the action. > It seems like they WANT us to be worthy. > > But if you will just sit there and let farmers land be grabbed and let > computers take out teachers with information you can't access being > fed to them and particpate in voting (now a criminal act I hear) :), > then I guess you get what you deserve > > On 4/9/14, mike c wrote: >> Well go on then, check out the light on Mars >> >> It can be anything you want, it's for you :) >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 12:03:16 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:03:16 -0500 Subject: OFF) Mars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I heard some pretty wild stuff said about Mars last night. One person was saying it appears to be only a satellite itself, and that the actual planet itself is GONE!! which is a real problem for human minds..... also, that radiation seems to indicate nuclear shenanigans, etc... But a 'new" concept has slipped into my field of vision- that some of recovered UFO technology, assuming it exists, was neither shot down by us, nor a crash, but maybe shot down FOR US..... WEEEEEEEE? I really think the (Amercan) public has got to stop the bozo shit going on so we can get in (safely) on some of the action. It seems like they WANT us to be worthy. But if you will just sit there and let farmers land be grabbed and let computers take out teachers with information you can't access being fed to them and particpate in voting (now a criminal act I hear) :), then I guess you get what you deserve On 4/9/14, mike c wrote: > Well go on then, check out the light on Mars > > It can be anything you want, it's for you :) > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 12:44:25 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:44:25 -0500 Subject: OFF) Mars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: the world sucks because humans are idiots who believe what they are told and fear the end On 4/11/14, mike c wrote: > It's time the people were RESPECTED, is my point > > sorry all this, I simply see the humans livng here as 'herds of > cattle" themselves > > On 4/11/14, mike c wrote: >> I heard some pretty wild stuff said about Mars last night. >> One person was saying it appears to be only a satellite itself, and >> that the actual planet itself is GONE!! >> >> which is a real problem for human minds..... >> >> also, that radiation seems to indicate nuclear shenanigans, etc... >> >> But a 'new" concept has slipped into my field of vision- >> >> that some of recovered UFO technology, assuming it exists, was neither >> shot down by us, nor a crash, but maybe shot down FOR US..... >> WEEEEEEEE? >> >> I really think the (Amercan) public has got to stop the bozo shit >> going on so we can get in (safely) on some of the action. >> It seems like they WANT us to be worthy. >> >> But if you will just sit there and let farmers land be grabbed and let >> computers take out teachers with information you can't access being >> fed to them and particpate in voting (now a criminal act I hear) :), >> then I guess you get what you deserve >> >> On 4/9/14, mike c wrote: >>> Well go on then, check out the light on Mars >>> >>> It can be anything you want, it's for you :) >>> >> > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 15:03:27 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:03:27 -0500 Subject: OFF) Mars (has an alternative love god) :) Message-ID: I'm putting more fresh air on my menu, I remembered to go look in the mirror, and while I go to my lonely corner please just do something about the continual Luciferian fear memes, as life could be so much more. Especially for 'you' :) it might still be a brutal animal food-chain reality and hard, but so much more On 4/9/14, mike c wrote: > Well go on then, check out the light on Mars > > It can be anything you want, it's for you :) > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 21:38:36 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:38:36 -0500 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 4/10/14, Steve Bishop wrote: > Sadly the Company I work for has gone all 'big brother' on emails and i > need to stop incoming non-work mails .... frustrating. > > Thanks > > Steve Dear Steve I admit I lacked the decency of consideration that some people are receiving mails at work. I assure that had I thought of that I would not have sent so many messages. Here is the link if it is not already done http://www.ispnetinc.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=BOC-L&A=1 From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Fri Apr 11 22:56:52 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:56:52 -0500 Subject: OFF) (edit) psychedelic "too muches" Message-ID: On 4/9/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Two people-- Alexander Shulgin and Dr David Nichols developed a lot > of psychedelics. Others have carried on their work. > > The problem is that they are then sold by online vendors and taken by kids > who do not do their research about doses. > > There have been a number of compounds with small enough doses to fit on a > blotter, but kids will then take more too quickly and the results can be > bad. LSD is not toxic but others have a much lower LD50 |(the dose at > which 50% dies). Interesting Jonathan, thanks for that. Unfortuanetly here, it looks like these kids were not being told what they got, not the one that died anyway. It (these kids here) just seems like "one more aspect" of something American that needs improving. I am not ralking about ingesting illegal drugs, I am talking spiritual. anyway, thanks, I will look at these things out of personal interest. Glad i did my acid before this is a problem :) From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Thu Apr 10 15:23:46 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (diff-A-cult) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:23:46 -0500 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I have a theory, based upon my ongoing work, that our parents are using the implant in the back of Mary's neck to "turn her off" by 10 :) they seem concerend with us NOT getting too established in the psychic department. after all, it's THEIR world...:) On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >> enjoy > > oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) > it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone > is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess > to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if > he's my cup of tea:) > > (his own personal) Link > > http://www.paralleltime.com/ > > "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) > From jkranitz at AURAL-INNOVATIONS.COM Sat Apr 12 07:56:08 2014 From: jkranitz at AURAL-INNOVATIONS.COM (Jerry Kranitz) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 07:56:08 -0400 Subject: Aural Innovations Radio: New Space Rock Show Message-ID: http://Aural-Innovations.com I've just uploaded a new show from Aural Innovations Space Rock Radio (show #329). See the playlist below. Aural Innovations broadcasts 24 hours a day in both streaming and download editions. You can go directly to the Radio shows page at: http://aural-innovations.com/radio/radio.html Aural Innovations Space Rock Radio (show #329) Spiralmaze - "Multiverse" (from Back to the Center) Octopus Syng - "Avant Garden" (from Reverberating Garden Number 7) Sendelica - "Zhyly Byly" (from The Fabled Voyages of the Sendelicans) Dadirri - "Atmospheric Control Strategies" (from Malum Scienta) ST 37 - "Pedro Pan" (from ISKCSP) Census of Hallucinations - "Delivering the Goods" (from The Nine) Aural Innovations ID (by Stone Premonitions) Census of Hallucinations - "Hieronymus" (from Spirit of Yellow) Census of Hallucinations - "Crystal Spheres of Light" (from Coming of the Unicorn) Causa Sui - "Mireille" (from Live at Freak Valley) Jay Tausig - "Saturn's Patient Servant" (from Capricorn: Top of the Mountain) Juke - "White Elephant" (from Atom Experiment) UNIT - "A Song For Barbara Jackson" Aural Innovations ID (by Stone Premonitions) Space Mushroom Fuzz - "Letters Talking" (from Future Shock) Kalutaliksuak - "They Shall Catch You Up For Sure" (from Kalutaliksuak 1992-93) Kalutaliksuak - "Buried Horizons" (from Death Of The Alpinist) http://Aural-Innovations.com From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sat Apr 12 10:32:09 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:32:09 -0400 Subject: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Ha, ha, Tim needs to find a night job, so I can flip my schedule back. Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of diff-A-cult Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:24 PM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) LSD overdoses for Mary and any interested I have a theory, based upon my ongoing work, that our parents are using the implant in the back of Mary's neck to "turn her off" by 10 :) they seem concerend with us NOT getting too established in the psychic department. after all, it's THEIR world...:) On 4/8/14, mike c wrote: > On 4/8/14, mary sullivan wrote: >> enjoy > > oh wow, you slipped one in on me :) > it could go either way- while the topic is right, my usual happy zone > is the scary stuff, but I am just nuts enough to maintain an openess > to superfreaks. I am sure i have heard him before but can't recall if > he's my cup of tea:) > > (his own personal) Link > > http://www.paralleltime.com/ > > "the mind is like a parachute. it only works when opened" :) > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sat Apr 12 10:49:13 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:49:13 -0400 Subject: OFF) (edit) psychedelic "too muches" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi friends, Maybe this too is another way they are trying to stop some of us getting in touch with the psychic realm in other ways, if I can center meditation is great, but I haven't had that "'aha," moment from that, yet. As usual, I'm probably trying too hard For thus who indulge, as always, know your source, I figured with all the other designer drugs eventually someone would try to make an enhanced version of lsd. Some things are best left as they are. Chris used to read Alexander Shulgin , but I'm not familiar wither David Nichols. There hasn't been much mention about lsd over the last 20 years, I thought it went way underground, or people were indo the mda type designer drugs. Best wishes to all, be happy, healthy, and safe, -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:57 PM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: OFF) (edit) psychedelic "too muches" On 4/9/14, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Two people-- Alexander Shulgin and Dr David Nichols developed a lot of > psychedelics. Others have carried on their work. > > The problem is that they are then sold by online vendors and taken by > kids who do not do their research about doses. > > There have been a number of compounds with small enough doses to fit > on a blotter, but kids will then take more too quickly and the results > can be bad. LSD is not toxic but others have a much lower LD50 |(the > dose at which 50% dies). Interesting Jonathan, thanks for that. Unfortuanetly here, it looks like these kids were not being told what they got, not the one that died anyway. It (these kids here) just seems like "one more aspect" of something American that needs improving. I am not ralking about ingesting illegal drugs, I am talking spiritual. anyway, thanks, I will look at these things out of personal interest. Glad i did my acid before this is a problem :) From hawkfan at RATSAUCE.CO.UK Sat Apr 12 10:59:04 2014 From: hawkfan at RATSAUCE.CO.UK (John Rennie) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:59:04 +0100 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? Message-ID: Hi Steve, As I recall you unsubscribe by sending an email containing just: UNSUBSCRIBE BOC-L to listserv at listserv.ispnetinc.net I don't think it matters what you put in the subject. John Rennie -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Bishop Sent: 10 April 2014 08:01 To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? Sadly the Company I work for has gone all 'big brother' on emails and i need to stop incoming non-work mails .... frustrating. Thanks Steve --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional corporate and regulatory EU disclosures and to http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about privacy. From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sat Apr 12 13:09:14 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:09:14 -0400 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? In-Reply-To: <01cf565f$Blat.v3.0.7$bf04168a$fe491daae8e@ratsnest> Message-ID: Bummer, Steve, we'll miss you, be well, and hopefully we'll hook up another way. Keep on Brockin. Good luck. Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of John Rennie Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 10:59 AM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? Hi Steve, As I recall you unsubscribe by sending an email containing just: UNSUBSCRIBE BOC-L to listserv at listserv.ispnetinc.net I don't think it matters what you put in the subject. John Rennie -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Bishop Sent: 10 April 2014 08:01 To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? Sadly the Company I work for has gone all 'big brother' on emails and i need to stop incoming non-work mails .... frustrating. Thanks Steve --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional corporate and regulatory EU disclosures and to http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about privacy. From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sat Apr 12 14:17:57 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:17:57 -0400 Subject: I need help with questions about surround sound settings Message-ID: Hi, friends, Being married to a sound engineer, and just being me, I need to know a few things about settings for surround sound. It's challenging enough that I can't figure out which setting is which with all these digital settings. When listening to recording in 5.1 surround, what is the right setting? If I want the surround effect for a stereo recording, do I need a different setting? My dear friend Mike, is always telling me to just play with it, and listen to the setting I like, but if something is actually recorded in 5.1 I want to hear it the way the artist meant for it to sound. There seems to be a setting for music, and 1 for movies. Any help from all you experts out there would be super appreciated. I miss using dials instead of pushing buttons, it's more difficult for me. Do I use DTS, autosurround, prologic, Err!!!! It sounds real good but I need accuracy. I hope Tim doesn't need to change the settings for me, if I need to use different settings, I need to find a way to do it myself. Chris always did want to teach me about sound,, I wish I had been open to learning more, he tried to teach me, but I didn't get it. It all seemed too complicated to meet the time, he was working doing beta testing for all kinds of cool Lexicon stuff. Having a sound studio in our living room for a while was quite a trip. The apartment was small. I need to find out if I can control this monster myself, it's a really nice monster, a bit intimidating, though, and if I were to study the manuals I might actually get some sleep which might not be bad, but that won't solve my problem, unless anyone wants to try projecting it telepathically when I am asleep which unfortunately, is at night. Love to all, Mary From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Sat Apr 12 14:38:28 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:38:28 -0500 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? In-Reply-To: <534973a7.064ae00a.54f4.5954SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 4/12/14, mary sullivan wrote: > Bummer, Steve, we'll miss you, be well, and hopefully we'll hook up > another > way. Keep on Brockin. Good luck. > > Mary I'll apologise to his work perosnally if he'll let me.... been blasting Nektar and UFO... calling you now Marypoopums From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Sat Apr 12 14:50:55 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:50:55 -0500 Subject: I need help with questions about surround sound settings In-Reply-To: <534983d6.8507e00a.4145.fffff424SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: oops. how dare I assume she wanted me to call. going back "in" It was me who rang. BTW, if you're not getting YOUR backrub I'll speak to Tim :) something's knocking you out :) On 4/12/14, mary sullivan wrote: > Hi, friends, > > Being married to a sound engineer, and just being me, I need to know a few > things about settings for surround sound. It's challenging enough that I > can't figure out which setting is which with all these digital settings. > When listening to recording in 5.1 surround, what is the right setting? > If I want the surround effect for a stereo recording, do I need a different > setting? My dear friend Mike, is always telling me to just play with it, > and listen to the setting I like, but if something is actually recorded in > 5.1 I want to hear it the way the artist meant for it to sound. There seems > to be a setting for music, and 1 for movies. Any help from all you experts > out there would be super appreciated. > > I miss using dials instead of pushing buttons, it's more difficult for me. > Do I use DTS, autosurround, prologic, Err!!!! It sounds real good but I > need > accuracy. I hope Tim doesn't need to change the settings for me, if I need > to use different settings, I need to find a way to do it myself. Chris > always did want to teach me about sound,, I wish I had been open to > learning > more, he tried to teach me, but I didn't get it. It all seemed too > complicated to meet the time, he was working doing beta testing for all > kinds of cool Lexicon stuff. Having a sound studio in our living room for > a > while was quite a trip. The apartment was small. > > I need to find out if I can control this monster myself, it's a really nice > monster, a bit intimidating, though, and if I were to study the manuals I > might actually get some sleep which might not be bad, but that won't solve > my problem, unless anyone wants to try projecting it telepathically when I > am asleep which unfortunately, is at night. > > > > Love to all, > > > > Mary > From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Sat Apr 12 18:23:26 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:23:26 -0500 Subject: I need help with questions about surround sound settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: some things, the first not relaleted to this 1) I know steve b is out of the office for a while. doubtful he'll be back too soon. he has a life. 2) I have precious little clue about surround settings. I only know my stereo could go up against Lucifer on just the first of the vitual theater settings, and I am still so amazed at the coolest thing I have ever encountered next to HW, I can't be bothered actually adjusting it yet, or even trying the "b" and "c" versions of it :) So in others words.....anyone with an actual brain needed!! 3) please don't punish me. I will get a handle on myself again I know I have cluttered the forum it it is depressing for me On 4/12/14, mike c wrote: > oops. how dare I assume she wanted me to call. > going back "in" > It was me who rang. > BTW, if you're not getting YOUR backrub I'll speak to Tim :) > something's knocking you out :) > > On 4/12/14, mary sullivan wrote: >> Hi, friends, >> >> Being married to a sound engineer, and just being me, I need to know a >> few >> things about settings for surround sound. It's challenging enough that I >> can't figure out which setting is which with all these digital settings. >> When listening to recording in 5.1 surround, what is the right setting? >> If I want the surround effect for a stereo recording, do I need a >> different >> setting? My dear friend Mike, is always telling me to just play with it, >> and listen to the setting I like, but if something is actually recorded >> in >> 5.1 I want to hear it the way the artist meant for it to sound. There >> seems >> to be a setting for music, and 1 for movies. Any help from all you >> experts >> out there would be super appreciated. >> >> I miss using dials instead of pushing buttons, it's more difficult for >> me. >> Do I use DTS, autosurround, prologic, Err!!!! It sounds real good but I >> need >> accuracy. I hope Tim doesn't need to change the settings for me, if I >> need >> to use different settings, I need to find a way to do it myself. Chris >> always did want to teach me about sound,, I wish I had been open to >> learning >> more, he tried to teach me, but I didn't get it. It all seemed too >> complicated to meet the time, he was working doing beta testing for all >> kinds of cool Lexicon stuff. Having a sound studio in our living room >> for >> a >> while was quite a trip. The apartment was small. >> >> I need to find out if I can control this monster myself, it's a really >> nice >> monster, a bit intimidating, though, and if I were to study the manuals I >> might actually get some sleep which might not be bad, but that won't >> solve >> my problem, unless anyone wants to try projecting it telepathically when >> I >> am asleep which unfortunately, is at night. >> >> >> >> Love to all, >> >> >> >> Mary >> > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sun Apr 13 07:39:42 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 07:39:42 -0400 Subject: I need help with questions about surround sound settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: If we're on the same schedule it's not like you need permission to call, we got in late from the concert, had to crash right away, "oh, the pain," (sorry, haven't slept much, and am punchy. I enjoy your postings, both on and off topic, they are fun and insightful, if you need someone to keep beating you up, I'll come down and do that for you, but really don't waste the energy. Thanks for trying to call, and your suggestions. Love, Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 6:23 PM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: I need help with questions about surround sound settings some things, the first not relaleted to this 1) I know steve b is out of the office for a while. doubtful he'll be back too soon. he has a life. 2) I have precious little clue about surround settings. I only know my stereo could go up against Lucifer on just the first of the vitual theater settings, and I am still so amazed at the coolest thing I have ever encountered next to HW, I can't be bothered actually adjusting it yet, or even trying the "b" and "c" versions of it :) So in others words.....anyone with an actual brain needed!! 3) please don't punish me. I will get a handle on myself again I know I have cluttered the forum it it is depressing for me On 4/12/14, mike c wrote: > oops. how dare I assume she wanted me to call. > going back "in" > It was me who rang. > BTW, if you're not getting YOUR backrub I'll speak to Tim :) > something's knocking you out :) > > On 4/12/14, mary sullivan wrote: >> Hi, friends, >> >> Being married to a sound engineer, and just being me, I need to know >> a few things about settings for surround sound. It's challenging >> enough that I can't figure out which setting is which with all these >> digital settings. >> When listening to recording in 5.1 surround, what is the right setting? >> If I want the surround effect for a stereo recording, do I need a >> different setting? My dear friend Mike, is always telling me to just >> play with it, and listen to the setting I like, but if something is >> actually recorded in >> 5.1 I want to hear it the way the artist meant for it to sound. There >> seems to be a setting for music, and 1 for movies. Any help from all >> you experts out there would be super appreciated. >> >> I miss using dials instead of pushing buttons, it's more difficult >> for me. >> Do I use DTS, autosurround, prologic, Err!!!! It sounds real good but >> I need accuracy. I hope Tim doesn't need to change the settings for >> me, if I need to use different settings, I need to find a way to do >> it myself. Chris always did want to teach me about sound,, I wish I >> had been open to learning >> more, he tried to teach me, but I didn't get it. It all seemed too >> complicated to meet the time, he was working doing beta testing for >> all kinds of cool Lexicon stuff. Having a sound studio in our living >> room for a while was quite a trip. The apartment was small. >> >> I need to find out if I can control this monster myself, it's a >> really nice monster, a bit intimidating, though, and if I were to >> study the manuals I might actually get some sleep which might not be >> bad, but that won't solve my problem, unless anyone wants to try >> projecting it telepathically when I am asleep which unfortunately, is >> at night. >> >> >> >> Love to all, >> >> >> >> Mary >> > From maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET Sun Apr 13 07:39:42 2014 From: maryann.sullivan1 at VERIZON.NET (mary sullivan) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 07:39:42 -0400 Subject: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Mike really don't think you have anything to apologize for, even if you didn't send 1 email Steve's situation would probably be the case in the work place, relax. Sounds like fun, What Nektar, never got into the band Ufo, thanks for turning me on to the series, saw you called, sorry was out, first concert in months. Mary -----Original Message----- From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET] On Behalf Of mike c Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:38 PM To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET Subject: Re: Can you please unsubscribe me from the BOC-L list ? On 4/12/14, mary sullivan wrote: > Bummer, Steve, we'll miss you, be well, and hopefully we'll hook up > another > way. Keep on Brockin. Good luck. > > Mary I'll apologise to his work perosnally if he'll let me.... been blasting Nektar and UFO... calling you now Marypoopums From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Sun Apr 13 11:27:55 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:27:55 -0500 Subject: I need help with questions about surround sound settings In-Reply-To: <534a7811.417ee50a.5de9.ffffc0c1SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 4/13/14, mary sullivan wrote: > If we're on the same schedule it's not like you need permission to call, we > got in late from the concert, had to crash right away, "oh, the pain," > (sorry, haven't slept much, and am punchy. I enjoy your postings, both on > and off topic, they are fun and insightful, if you need someone to keep > beating you up, I'll come down and do that for you, but really don't waste > the energy. Thanks for trying to call, and your suggestions. > > Love, > > Mary > Thanks Mary I jumped in on this for a reason actually- Mine almost didn't get hooked up, and is the kind with it's own power supply Keith i hope you saw this. Despite the political incorrectness, if you've never tried it i hope you will grab one and check it out. Thanks Mary, as ALWAYS and I ask unrelated are the coneheads REALLY controlling/helping with world finances?? If so I would like to call them by what they refer to themselves and prefer. From insect.brain at GMAIL.COM Wed Apr 23 20:04:26 2014 From: insect.brain at GMAIL.COM (mike c) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:04:26 -0500 Subject: OFF Message-ID: BRAPPPP!! scuse me :) (covers mouth with hand looking nnocent :) From des at EFALKMEDIA.COM Wed Apr 23 20:14:14 2014 From: des at EFALKMEDIA.COM (EMFalk) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:14:14 -0400 Subject: OFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Mmmmmm...the scent of food stuffs in the air. On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:04:26 -0400, mike c wrote: > BRAPPPP!! > > scuse me :) > > (covers mouth with hand looking nnocent :) > -- ?Sometimes life is merely a matter of coffee and whatever intimacy a cup of coffee affords.? ?Richard Brautigan --Check Out my blog and my journey: www.areturningadultstudent.com From M.Holmes at ED.AC.UK Thu Apr 24 07:38:56 2014 From: M.Holmes at ED.AC.UK (Michael Holmes) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:38:56 +0100 Subject: Uku what? Message-ID: Gig alert: http://www.cornex.co.uk/ukulele-orchestra-great-britain because they may play: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBweqmLk6dU which has to rank highly amongst Weird Hawkwind Covers. -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From des at EFALKMEDIA.COM Thu Apr 24 09:10:35 2014 From: des at EFALKMEDIA.COM (Eric Falk) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:10:35 -0400 Subject: Uku what? In-Reply-To: <5358F7D0.5000505@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: That made my morning! Thanks. On 4/24/2014 7:38 AM, Michael Holmes wrote: > Gig alert: > > http://www.cornex.co.uk/ukulele-orchestra-great-britain > > because they may play: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBweqmLk6dU > > which has to rank highly amongst Weird Hawkwind Covers. > -- "It's strange how the simple things in life go on while we become more difficult." --Richard Brautigan